Archive for the ‘How did I get the shot’ Category

How I got the shot #2

This shot is very different to my previous ‘How I got the shot‘ post. The conditions where very different and I approached it in a different way too.

medlockvalley-9

Location

This is actually only 5 minutes from my front door in Oldham in the North West of England. We don’t get that many bright, clear days so I wanted to make the most of it. It is taken in the Medlock Valley.

Equipment

For this little photo walk, I wanted to challenge myself a bit so instead of taking out all my camera gear, I took just one lens. So I took my Sony Alpha a100 and my Minolta 50mm f1.7 lens out with me. This means that I had no zoom to help frame the image, so I would have to move to get the picture I wanted.

The Process

I saw this photo possibility from a little way off. The sky was a nice blue with some nice whispy clouds to give the sky a bit interest. The light was good on the grass, and fortunately the grass was a nice contrasting colour to the sky.

So all the ingredients were there, I just had to mix them together to get a decent result.

The tree was a perfect focal point in the picture, but the tricky thing was, where to place it in the frame. Should I comply to the Rule Of Thirds and position it more off centre and lower down? Should I include more sky or more grass? Should I try and find a larger focal point for the image or climb the hill to make the tree larger in the frame?

Lots of options, and who’s to say some of those options would have made a better image, but this is the way I decided on.

So onto camera settings. I knew I wanted to make sure as much of the grass was in focus as possible which meant a large depth of field, which meant using a small aperture (large f number). So I set the aperture, again with the camera on aperture priority, and checked to see what the shutter speed was going to be like. I needed to make sure I captured the grass as sharp as possible so I needed a fast enough shutter speed to avoid too much blur caused by the wind. So I ended up with f14 to get a lot in focus, and 1/200th to try and keep things as blur free as possible.

The Result

Well I am pleased with the result. I did take a few different compositions but this is the one that I liked the most. It’s the sort of arty type print that might be good for a wall and it’s also got a lot of space in it so it might be good for a magazine cover or advert in a magazine, so it has certain commercial possibilities too.

I’m not really into landscape photography but I did enjoy the walk I did and the images I ended up with.

Let me know what you think of the image and if you’ve ever challenged yourself in photography like this.

Posted on April 17th, 2008 by Garry  |  6 Comments »

How I got the shot #1

When I was learning photography (actually I’m still learning) I liked other photographers to explain how they reached the final image that I was looking at. Sometimes it was a lot simpler than it looks, and all it took was an understanding of the basics.

So, I thought I would do the same thing to hopefully help people get some good results, or at least improve their images a little.

Now, I will be the first to admit that I don’t class myself as an expert photographer. I don’t know everything about it, but I know enough to get images that I am pleased with and images that others have liked, so I must be doing something right.

So here is the first shot:

Chimp-2

Location

Taken at Chester Zoo on 19th March 2008. It was in the chimp house which is dark, the chimps are behind some dirty glass and there is not enough room to setup a tripod.

Equipment

  • Sony Alpha a100
  • Minolta 300mm f2.8 Lens

Original Image

Original Chimp-2

The Process

Before I took this picture, I watched this chimp for a while when it was getting comfortable, so I already had an idea of the type of shot I wanted to end up with. As I couldn’t use a tripod, I had to hand hold the camera for this shot. The 300mm lens is a big heavy lens so it’s not the easiest of things to hand hold, so I found somewhere I could prop my arm up on to help support the lens a bit more. This would reduce the amount of camera shake a bit. The other advantage I had was that my camera, the Sony Alpha a100, has a built in anti shake system which again helps to reduce the camera shake a little.

I had my camera set to aperture priority so I could control the aperture and not have to worry about the shutter speed setting, although you still have to be aware of what the camera is doing.

As there was very little light, I knew I needed a wide aperture to let in as much light as possible. My lens had a maximum aperture of f2.8, so I set that. I checked to see what shutter speed the camera was choosing. 1/30th of a second. Now that may seem quick, but is actually quite slow in photography terms so I new I was risking a blurred image. The added benefit of using a wide aperture was that it blurred the background out meaning there were less distractions in the background.

I waited until the chimp stopped moving and hoped both would stay still long enough. I fired off about 4 shots hoping that one would be sharp enough to use. When I took the shots I tried my best to move as little as possible, I held my breath too to try and keep camera shake to a minimum. This can take some practice and finding a comfortable, stable position is not always easy.

Looking at the image on the back of my camera, I knew it looked ok, but you can never tell until you get it up on a computer screen.

When I got home, I loaded up my images into Adobe Lightroom, which is my preferred choice of image software, and checked my images. This one ended up being the sharpest of the few I took.

I’m not going to go into the technicalities of what I did in Lightroom as this post is more about taking the picture than the post processing. I already had in mind black and white, but first I corrected the exposure a bit and applied a crop to get rid of some of the empty background.

I then applied a black and white conversion and applied a little split toning to add a slight hint of colour so it’s not pure black and white. I also got rid of a distracting highlight just under the chimps head which was caused by the dirty glass I think.

The result

I am very pleased with the resulting image, and you can see that there was nothing really technical about taking the picture, it was more about knowing what settings to use in the conditions and what the limitations of those settings were.

I’ve got more of these posts planned, so hopefully they will help you a bit.

Let me know your thoughts.

Posted on March 20th, 2008 by Garry  |  11 Comments »