<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Photography Quick Tip#6 &#8211; Use a tripod</title> <atom:link href="http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/05/photography-quick-tip6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/05/photography-quick-tip6/</link> <description>Learn the basics of digital photography in easy steps</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Garry</title><link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/05/photography-quick-tip6/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link> <dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:35:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/05/photography-quick-tip6-use-a-tripod/#comment-439</guid> <description>A good tripod, now there&#039;s a tricky one. It largely depends on how you are going to use it. If you want to carry it around a lot then a light weight aluminium or carbon fibre would be a good choice, but that may be at the expense of sturdiness. If you are in the studio then a big heavy tripod will give you better stability but will be a pain to move around. So a &#039;good&#039; tripod is not that simple.
The Kood model you referred to isn&#039;t a very well known model. It&#039;s likely to be better than the cheap jessops model for sure, but might not be hugely better.
Tripods from Manfrotto, Slik, Giottos, Gitzo (expensive) and a few other brands are all good, and add a decent head to them and you&#039;ll have a good all rounder, but expect to pay up to £150 for a good setup.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good tripod, now there&#8217;s a tricky one. It largely depends on how you are going to use it. If you want to carry it around a lot then a light weight aluminium or carbon fibre would be a good choice, but that may be at the expense of sturdiness. If you are in the studio then a big heavy tripod will give you better stability but will be a pain to move around. So a &#8216;good&#8217; tripod is not that simple.<br
/> The Kood model you referred to isn&#8217;t a very well known model. It&#8217;s likely to be better than the cheap jessops model for sure, but might not be hugely better.<br
/> Tripods from Manfrotto, Slik, Giottos, Gitzo (expensive) and a few other brands are all good, and add a decent head to them and you&#8217;ll have a good all rounder, but expect to pay up to £150 for a good setup.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Cartmell</title><link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/05/photography-quick-tip6/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link> <dc:creator>John Cartmell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/05/photography-quick-tip6-use-a-tripod/#comment-437</guid> <description>What counts as a good tripod? I have a flimsy Jessops that is only of use if you don&#039;t touch it. I&#039;ve found a Kood 284 for £55 (head £30 extra) - so is that &#039;good&#039;, not so good, or &#039;over the top&#039;? I simply don&#039;t know.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What counts as a good tripod? I have a flimsy Jessops that is only of use if you don&#8217;t touch it. I&#8217;ve found a Kood 284 for £55 (head £30 extra) &#8211; so is that &#8216;good&#8217;, not so good, or &#8216;over the top&#8217;? I simply don&#8217;t know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
