<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An example of depth of field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/</link>
	<description>Learn the basics of digital photography in easy steps</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>They are called vortex generators, nice and concise explanation using an excellent example. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are called vortex generators, nice and concise explanation using an excellent example. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank, glad you found it useful. The wing, I think, is from a ... well, it's not a harrier, but the one that's very similar to a harrier, or maybe came before the harrier that looks exactly the same. It's sitting at Brooklands museum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank, glad you found it useful. The wing, I think, is from a &#8230; well, it&#8217;s not a harrier, but the one that&#8217;s very similar to a harrier, or maybe came before the harrier that looks exactly the same. It&#8217;s sitting at Brooklands museum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>oh, and I'm also curious as to what the wing is from ? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and I&#8217;m also curious as to what the wing is from ? <img src='http://www.photography-basics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent example, coupled with the short article explaining aperture priority mode it has really helped me understand things better.  Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent example, coupled with the short article explaining aperture priority mode it has really helped me understand things better.  Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Macro Photography? &#183; Photography Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Macro Photography? &#183; Photography Basics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photography-basics.com/2007/04/an-example-of-depth-of-field/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] Depth of field is also going to be more obvious. Being that close up you will need to use a small aperture to make sure you get a suitably large area in focus, although you can also use aperture creatively to pick out one area. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Depth of field is also going to be more obvious. Being that close up you will need to use a small aperture to make sure you get a suitably large area in focus, although you can also use aperture creatively to pick out one area. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
